Wednesday, November 7, 2012

Decision 2012 — Mourning After Thoughts


[My intent is not to vilify, demonize or condemn those who support the partisan duopoly candidates, but rather to help reveal to my fellow Americans what could be the greatest deception of our current age.]


I challenge EVERYONE who voted for either tyrant (Obama or Romney) to watch this 20 minute video:

"Worshiping Government — Message To The Voting Cattle"
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=t5FNDRgPOLs

It's a difficult message for us to hear that strikes a deep chord within the heart of the individual, because it makes a very good case for our own culpability in the massive and ongoing criminal actions against humanity committed by our own government — a government supposedly elected by the People in a "fair" election process.

However, I bet that those few who actually try to watch it will also find it very difficult because they cannot really understand and/or stomach the truth of this matter.  Can you?  I pray so!

I was inspired to share this video and write this blogpost upon receiving an email this morning which began with the statements: "Panic won't help, prayer will — yes, we're in trouble now."  I had to laugh as I responded, "We're in trouble NOW???"  As if we haven't been in trouble for decades!  8-)

It continues to astound me how the masses honestly believe we somehow won't be in as much trouble if their preferred "lesser-of-two-evils" authoritarian collectivist candidate for President wins.  In this case, as if electing a so called "Conservative" THIS TIME would somehow set "Neo-Amerika" upon some course other than that of total economic and social destruction, and repeal tyrannical legislation which violates the unalienable rights of the individual and the US Constitution.

I question: Which so called "Conservative" (or "Liberal") President has ever challenged the establishment for whom they work?  Which of them has ever truly challenged the immoral fractional banking and Federal Reserve system that has been thieving from ALL American generations in perpetuity for a century or so now?  Which of them has ever stood up in opposition to the immoral and inefficient Income Tax scheme which violates ALL individuals' right to privacy?

Yes, as a Christian, I do believe prayer will help — but prayer for what exactly… for those who "run" this country to somehow repent from their continued evil deeds which violate individual rights and the US Constitution, or for those who continue to repeatedly elect such tyrants into office to stop doing so?  I'm largely convinced that "We the People" and those we elect are far too deceived to repent, for how can someone repent when they don't even understand how they're sinning?

The author of "Message to the Voting Cattle" might not view the masses to be so deceived, which could be one cause resulting in such a tone of condemnation he attributes to this character's words from his fictional book.  However, as a Christian who believes in a spiritual battle continually taking place beyond the physical, I might have a slightly different viewpoint than he does regarding the extent of our own sole culpability in these continued crimes against humanity.

Revelation 12:9 says that satan deceives the whole world — and I believe it's correct!  Spiritually, he has deceived the religions of man into twisting Biblical scriptures for millennia, often resulting in the substitution of God's instruction with traditions of men.  Politically, he has duped the masses into believing in these false ideologies, "Liberal" & "Conservative", when the truth is that these terms have become mere descriptions of the contemporary political partisan duopoly, that in reality exists within the authoritarian ideology of Collectivism, which includes Socialism, Fascism, and other social-political-economic constructs which prohibit individual freedoms and free markets.

Ultimately these deceived masses replace the Creator with the State as the source of our liberty and justice, thus trading the worship of the Creator for the worship of the State — breaking Commandment #1: "Thou shalt have no other gods before Me."

My prayer is that the eyes of more people be opened to this great deception as the end of this age draws near — NOT so they can help to potentially change this nation (no, I'm afraid it's far too late for that, and I'm convinced that humanity is simply incapable of governing itself in accordance with LIBERTY) — but so they can PREPARE themselves both spiritually and physically for what lies ahead: the total collapse of society as we currently know it.

Of course, I am entirely disappointed with the outcome of this election which I successfully predicted over four years ago.  But I also knew I would be disappointed if my prediction turned out to be wrong, because I simply cannot support any authoritarian collectivist candidate that champions tyranny over liberty (see my blogpost: Choosing Sides — Good VS Evil).

I remain looking forward to the point in time when justice will ultimately be served — I just don't believe it can be served at the hand of man.

8-)

bernard baruch carman
* * *
- truth seeker/seeder • SeedsOfTruth.org • ∞Liberty
infinityGAMES ∞ audio/Mac specialist
∞ ∞ ∞


i believe noteworthy…

the day after writing this blogpost i discovered a comment to another online article citing "State worship" from an individual who said, "I am a Christian... and at times like this Romans 13 is my least favorite chapter of scripture (although I know when I struggle with scripture it is my problem, not God's)."

because of the way this was stated i perceived this individual to be wiser than average and was moved to reply to their comment:

there are many false teachings from many pulpits regarding Romans 13.  i began a study in this a while back and just haven't gotten back to finishing it, so i apologize for not being able to share it with you.  so i'll try and just give you a few thoughtful highlights from my perspective on this seemingly contradicting scripture...

YES — as Christians, we are to obey the law of the land... but are we also not supposed to stand up in opposition when the government breaks it?  after all, here, we are supposed to have a government of, for and by the People… therefore, is it not to some degree our own responsibility when our own government violates both the limiting power of the US Constitution and violates the liberties of its own People?

YES — we are to render unto Caesar what is his... but WHO is Caesar in a supposedly self-governing nation?  (We the People are supposed to be!)  and what if the very "money" our nation uses is not only based on a lie, but is also part of a fiat money and banking system which has been thieving from ALL future American generations in perpetuity since a century or so — should us Christians not stand up on opposition to this evil?

YES — we are to pay taxes as according to the law of the land... but what if those taxes violate the very right to privacy which was granted to us by our very Creator?  further, what if that tax system was deceptively written to appear that it applies to ALL Americans, when it really only applies to a specific set of people?

YES — we are to obey the authorities, but most Christians understand that God's hand was in the American Revolution — a revolution waged against a State (Crown in that case) which was violating the unalienable rights of individuals!  if the Colonists understand Romans 13 the way many so called "preachers of God" teach today, there would never had been an American Revolution, and they would have continued their march toward total slavery without any such opposition to tyranny.

LIBERTY is of Christ, while TYRANNY is of satan.  therefore, authoritarian collectivist tyrants will twist Romans 13 (as they do with many other scriptures) in order to make otherwise free individuals believe that they must voluntarily accept their slavery under the all powerful State, which in turn becomes their lord god and master — of course, they don't put it quite like that and probably don't even understand it due to being deceived, but that's the truth.

"Message to the Voting Cattle" brutally exemplifies that the masses have been duped into State worship, while believing such lies as those being portrayed about Biblical scriptures like Romans 13.

of course, individuals who are deceived into purchasing the lies of Collectivism — the ideology that teaches the individual exists for the masses, regardless whether they lean Socialist or Fascist — might read this and comment how much of a "kook" (or some other colorful adjective) i am for saying such things!

but when one takes the time to deeply investigate further into this world filled with deception, one will find that the ideology of Individualism which is rooted in the philosophy of LIBERTY stands in the light of TRUTH, which i believe comes only from one source: Christ, who is our Creator.  all Collectivist ideologies (including Socialism & Fascism) are from a completely different source that would rather have all humanity remain in darkness.

during these end times deception will continue to grow so very great that it will continue to be most difficult to see through it.  may God grant you the ability to do so, and also to persevere through all that we must face as we reap the results of allowing authoritarian collectivist tyrants to usurp our Creator-given individual liberties for many decades.  8-)

Thursday, September 20, 2012

Choosing Sides – Good VS Evil


My reply to everyone who sends me pro-Obama/anti-Romney and/or pro-Romney/anti-Obama propaganda:  if I have to choose a "side", I'm going to objectively examine the facts and then choose GOOD (LIBERTY) over EVIL (TYRANNY).

In other words, I aim to support a Presidential candidate whose ideology largely falls on the side of LIBERTY.  Therefore, if it's between the "lesser of two evils", I'll support NEITHER, and rather vote for someone who to a much greater degree stands for truth, justice and liberty, even if they have little to no chance of being elected.  If there is still no one that I feel meets this criteria, I'll vote NOTA.

I cannot really recall a time in my life where the partisan duopoly candidates did not represent a "lesser of two evils" scenario, except perhaps for those two unique times in the 90's when Americans actually had a third option… but then of course, the tyrannical partisan duopoly tweaked the "rules" in order to make it nearly impossible from THAT ever happening again.

I have not voted for the lesser of TWO EVILS since I was a teenager and knew no better.  IF Americans would have long ago removed their heads from whatever dark void in which they reside and dispensed with supporting "lesser evils", this massive government corruption — at every level — would have perhaps been greatly minimized by now.

And BTW, this is NOT the "most important election" since whenever.  It's astonishing how the Sheeple of Neo-Amerika actually believe that lie every 4 years!

Further, the "end of liberty in America" did not recently occur.  That largely began occurring in 1913, if not earlier when the 14th Amendment was passed (if you don't know why, consider further education on the subject).  As with going off the gold standard, the "end of liberty in America" has been slow and steady over a century or so, and NO ADMINISTRATION of the partisan duopoly has ever made a serious effort to turn US around from this course toward national destruction (well, perhaps ONE President had planned on investigating the Federal Reserve and the fractional banking system, and we know how he was dealt with).

Getting back to this election as a "lesser of two evils" example, when one votes for Obama or Romney, they vote in support of Collectivism of one form or another which breeds only tyranny & slavery:  as a so called "Liberal", Obama and his ilk most often lean toward the Socialist side of Collectivism; while as a so called "Conservative", Romney and his ilk most often lean toward the Fascist side of Collectivism — BOTH of these political-economic systems (Socialism AND Fascism) fall within the ideology of Collectivism which is diametrically opposed to Individualism, and therefore, at enmity with LIBERTY.

And really, if you are one who believes in a supernatural Creator of all things and through whom all liberty is derived, it might be noteworthy for you to consider that since Collectivism is at enmity with liberty, it is therefore also at enmity with the Creator.  Since I happen to be one who believes in such a Creator, I cannot in good conscience support ANY potential leader of our country who subscribes to such an anti-liberty ideology.

Our founding fathers like Jefferson, Adams, Franklin, etc., would be rolling in their graves for over a century now if they were alive and conscience as the masses who, although through much deception, have continued to elect Collectivist after Collectivist, liar after liar, and crook after crook, whose very actions are aligned with the REAL adversary behind the physical-spiritual curtain through which we cannot yet clearly see.

We the Sheeple of Neo-Amerika FULLY DESERVE what's coming — TOTAL ECONOMIC COLLAPSE — and Continuing to elect these Collectivist "lesser evils" who make up the corrupted political "ruling class" will certainly do ABSOLUTELY NOTHING to prevent this from occurring.

Whether Obama or Romney are elected, we will continue to witness — as we do EVERY term regardless which so called "lesser evil side" of the partisan duopoly is in power — continued Constitutional violations (and lawlessness in general at all levels of government and within all branches: Executive, Legislative, and Judicial), continued usurpation of our unalienable Creator-given individual liberties, and continued foolish social, monetary & foreign policies.  In short, as a nation we're DOOMED!

Time is PAST for "electing our way out of this mess" — time is NOW for preparing oneself SPIRITUALLY & PHYSICALLY, for the sake of all our loved ones who wish to endure the coming unavoidable apocalypse.

Still, I will vote in good conscience:  NOT in support of ANY so called "lesser evil", but rather FOR truth, justice, and liberty.

Pray for us; for we are confident that we have a good conscience, in all things desiring to live honorably.  — Hebrews 13:18

In liberty always...

8-)

bernard baruch carman
* * *
- truth seeker/seeder • SeedsOfTruth.org • ∞Liberty
infinityGAMES ∞ audio/Mac specialist
∞ ∞ ∞

Friday, August 24, 2012

Enforcing AVL Ordinances EQUALLY



I wrote the following letter to the AVL City Council, County Commissioners, local law enforcement (Police & Sheriff), and the City Legal Dept... oh, and the local ACLU.

But it seems none of them care about this violation of local City ordinances which mandate a $500 permit fee to expose naked breasts, nor does anyone seem to care about the CIty violating the 14th Amendment in NOT enforcing the law equally.

Not only that, but our Asheville City officials apparently still claim they have "no legal way to stop a topless rally".

Can anyone say, "SELECTIVE ENFORCEMENT"???  There — I knew you could!

8-)

bbc

———

Enforcing AVL Ordinances EQUALLY


Dear local City of Asheville & Buncombe County representatives, Law Enforcement, and City Legal Department:


There is a so called "protest" coming up on Sunday, Aug 26 that I would like to draw your attention to, in regards to a legal matter.

Upon hearing various arguments regarding this "GoTopless.org" event, I published a blogpost entitled "Right to Public Indecency?", which addresses the REAL issue of rights being violated — OUR rights as taxpayers to walk in PUBLIC without being forced to witness "public indecency.

As I continued to consider how the City of Asheville is allowing this event to happen by permit, I began to think about the current City ordinances which prohibit women from revealing particular areas of their breasts, unless they pay a $500 fee each year.

You see, I know about this ordinance because back in 1991/92 when I ran the nightclub 45 Cherry, I was fined a great deal of money for having a ladies show at my facility wherein some of the ladies performing elected to violate our contract and not obey this new local ordinance.

While I was — and still am — in opposition to such an ordinance disguised in a cloak of "moral concern" (but really about money), I also realize that the City of Asheville cannot legally impose certain ordinances upon some, and not upon others:

State & City ordinances are to be enforced EQUALLY among ALL citizens, otherwise violate the Fourteenth Amendment of the US Constitution.

So now we have a non-local business coming to our City in order to parade topless women in our PUBLIC streets while violating our civil rights, and they are somehow being pardoned from paying the fee of $500 for each woman participating.

Folks, this is a blatant violation of the Fourteenth Amendment and is a slap in the face to all local women who are forced to pay the $500 fee each year in order to do the same exact thing — local women who support our local economy!

Beyond the blatant Fourteenth Amendment violation, it makes no sense whatsoever to force local businesses and performers to comply with such ordinances in their PRIVATE businesses where no one is forced to enter, but allow anyone to parade topless in PUBLIC without incurring the "fee" for such "permit".

The City of Asheville must enforce ALL local ordinances EQUALLY or risk a civil lawsuit.

I have also recently been forced to come into compliance of another City of Asheville ordinance found in the UDO, and as a result I am currently facing foreclosure of my home of 24+ years.

Therefore, I ask local government:  If these non-locals are not going to be forced to obey local ordinances, why should we locals obey them?  If this happens on August 26 without enforcing this local ordinance, will this now set a legal precedent that local ordinances are optional?  Seems to me that it will!

And if this "GoTopless" event is allowed to continue without their paying the same fees that locals have to pay, then I personally want my money back from the fines I had to pay back in 1992... and I'd be pretty certain that every single local woman who has paid their share of fees for decades will also want their money back as well, and will no longer be obliged to pay the fee.

Further, doing so will set the legal precedent that We the People who live in the City of Asheville are no longer required to obey ANY City ordinances — either EVERYONE obeys them, or NO ONE obeys them... it's really that simple.

Below my signature are excerpts from the applicable City of Asheville ordinances, their web links, and with my notes.

I look forward to hearing back from you ASAP.

Thank you for your time,

8-)

bernard baruch carman
* * *
* * *
- truth seeker/seeder • SeedsOfTruth.org • ∞Liberty
infinity games ∞ audio/Mac specialist
∞∞∞



City of Asheville "Adult Entertainer" ordinances

(I've bolded applicable terms in the statutes, along with my notes.)




Sec. 9-26. - Definitions.
The following words, terms and phrases, when used in this article, shall have the meanings ascribed to them in this section, except where the context clearly indicates a different meaning:
Business includes each trade, occupation, profession, business and franchise taxed under this article.
Seasonal means a business that is conducted for profit six months out of the year or less.

Sec. 9-29. - Persons required to pay tax.
Each person who conducts a business within the city is subject to this article. A person "conducts a business" when he engages in one act of business taxed under this article. He conducts the business "within the city" if he maintains a business location within the city or if, either personally or through agents, he:
(1)
Solicits business within the city limits; or
(2)
Picks up or delivers goods or services within the city limits.



• NOTE: By these local legal definitions, the GoTopless organization IS in fact operating as "Seasonal" during the so called, "GoTopless protest", soliciting business within the Asheville city limits by advertising themselves and their website, upon which it sells wares on their Shop page for profit.




Sec. 9-172. - Definitions.
The following words, terms and phrases, when used in this article, shall have the meanings ascribed to them in this section, except where the context clearly indicates a different meaning:
...
Adult establishment means an adult bookstore, adult motion picture theatre, adult mini motion picture theatre or adult live entertainment business as defined in this section.
Adult live entertainment means any performance of or involving the actual presence of real people which exhibits specified sexual activities or specified anatomical areas, as defined in this section.
Adult live entertainment business means any establishment or business wherein adult live entertainment is shown for observation by patrons.
...
Entertainer means any person who provides entertainment within or at an adult establishment, whether or not a fee is charged or accepted for entertainment and whether or not entertainment is provided by that person as an employee or an independent contractor.
...
Specified anatomical areas means:
(1)
Less than completely and opaquely covered:
a.
Human genitals, pubic region,
b.
Buttock, or
c.
Female breast below a point immediately above the top of the areola; or
(2)
Human male genitals in a discernibly turgid state, even if completely and opaquely covered.


• NOTE: By these local legal definitions, the "GoTopless" organization/business IS a form of an "Adult establishment" (nothing in the statute specifies a "building" as part of the definition) because it provides "adult live entertainment": there IS a presence of real people exhibiting "specified anatomical areas", which include the entire female breast.



Sec. 9-173. - Application for licenses.
(a)
Business license.
(1)
It shall be unlawful for any person to operate or maintain an adult establishment in the city unless the owner or operator thereof has obtained an adult establishment license from the city. It shall also be unlawful for any person to operate such business after such license has been revoked or suspended by the city or has expired.
(2)
It shall be unlawful for any entertainer to knowingly perform any work, service or entertainment directly related to the operation of an unlicensed adult establishment within the city.
(3)
It shall be prima facie evidence that any adult establishment that fails to have posted, in the manner required by this article, an adult establishment license, has not obtained such a license. In addition, it shall be prima facie evidence that any entertainer who performs any service or entertainment in an adult establishment in which an adult establishment license is not posted, in the manner required by this article, had knowledge that such business was not licensed.
(b)
Entertainer license. It is unlawful for any person to work as an entertainer at an adult establishment without first obtaining a license to do so from the city, or to work as an entertainer at an adult establishment after such person's license to do so has been revoked or suspended by the city or has expired.


Sec. 9-180. - Violations and penalties.
Any person violating any provision of this article shall, upon conviction, be guilty of a Class 3 misdemeanor and be punishable by a fine not to exceed $500.00 or imprisoned for not more than 30 days. Each day such violation shall continue shall constitute a separate offense.



• NOTE: By these local legal definitions, BOTH the owner of the adult establishment AND the entertainer of the adult establishment are required to obtain licenses, otherwise be fined accordingly.

###

Tuesday, August 14, 2012

Boiling Down the Political Deception


I continue striving to find new ways of revealing the great political deception of "Liberalism" VS "Conservatism".

In a Facebook post today, I again attempt to boil it down as simply as possible so that others can perhaps better see the light of LIBERTY.  Here is what I said:

There is simply no such thing as "conservatism" nor "liberalism" as ideologies.  Rather, the two opposing ideologies continually at odds are Individualism VS Collectivism.

Within Collectivism there exists Socialism & Fascism, both of which are at enmity with LIBERTY.

However, Collectivists have figured out that it would be best in order to remain in control over otherwise FREE individuals (Individualists) if they could sell the LIE that the REAL battle is fought on a one dimensional political axis between Socialism & Fascism, both of which breed slavery.

So over time they twisted the non-ideological meanings of the words "conservative" & "liberal" and assigned them to these tyrannical political systems, teaching these to be the only two choices in order to keep the masses fighting for their own FALSE ideology.

And this trick continues to work very well, as the overwhelming majority of Americans have purchased this lie hook, line & sinker, and continue to perpetuate it in voting the same Collectivists into political office year after year.

How can We the People break out of it?  Consider this plan: STOP claiming to advocate a FALSE ideology and embrace Individualism NOW!!!

Tuesday, August 7, 2012

Beer & Liberty

I read about this a while back and just wanted to post these links here for posterity.  It's just another, even if minor (to some ;-) example of how LIBERTY can actually create PROSPERITY!

8-)

bbc
∞∞∞

What Beer Deregulation Can Teach Us

http://reason.com/blog/2010/08/06/what-beer-deregulation-can-tea


How Jimmy Carter Saved Beer

http://www.tnr.com/blog/jonathan-chait/76819/how-jimmy-carter-saved-beer

Saturday, July 21, 2012

Right to Public Indecency?



The beauty of the human form — especially the female form 8-) — is not the issue regarding "PUBLIC indecency".  It REALLY is about the violation of rights.

However, those who claim the "violation of civil rights" as an argument for defense of PUBLIC indecency are forgetting something: what about violating the individual rights of others?

You see, everyone has the right to be in PUBLIC without being involuntarily subjected to seeing naked people... because they're in PUBLIC!

When individuals wish to be naked, they can exercise that right in PRIVATE.  Otherwise, do these particular people who advocate the "right to PUBLIC indecency" think they have the so called "right" to do ANYTHING they want in PUBLIC?

The words "PUBLIC" & "PRIVATE" have different meanings and functions associated with them, and therefore, legislation associated with them ALSO often differs.

For example, everyone has the unalienable individual right to smoke.  However, no one in a PUBLIC facility should ever be subjected to the risk of involuntarily inhaling second hand smoke, because PUBLIC facilities have to be made as accessible as possible to ALL individuals without having to endure such involuntary health risks.

On the contrary, PRIVATE facilities should never be regulated by government regarding smoking because PRIVATE facilities do not necessarily have to be made as accessible as possible to ALL individuals — in fact, the opposite is true.  (Of course, there are various occasions where legislators have failed to recognize this and have violated the rights of PRIVATE property owners by enacting bad laws, but that's for another discussion.)

For another example, all "adults" have the unalienable individual right to voluntarily engage in sexual acts with one another.  However, no one in PUBLIC should ever be involuntarily subjected to witness such acts.  On the contrary, engaging in such acts in PRIVATE should never be regulated by government.  (But of course, there are individuals who believe they somehow have the authority to so violate the rights of others and regulate such acts in PRIVATE via government, but again that's for another discussion.)

For one final and popular example, everyone has the unalienable individual right to free speech.  However, no one has the right to yell "FIRE!" in a PUBLIC area, potentially inciting panic leading to injury or even death without potentially facing legal punishment.  In such case, doing likewise in a PRIVATE area might ALSO lead to similar consequences.  (Remember: along with LIBERTY comes great RESPONSIBILITY.)

These examples are given to illustrate how legislation governing PRIVATE vs. PUBLIC areas often CAN and SHOULD differ in various circumstances.  Those who seek to ignore this fact are certain to reach such erroneous and immature conclusions regarding "civil rights".

Therefore, wherever state law "allows breasts to be exposed in public view in a non-sexual manner", individuals AND ESPECIALLY those responsible for enforcing the law should question the INTENT of the specific statute and act accordingly in situations of PUBLIC indecency.  If it is later determined that the statute's wording causes confusion with regard to its INTENT, then the appropriate legislators should do their job and correct the problematic language.

My first guess is that one intent behind such a statute might have something to do with protecting a mother from arrest due to briefly exposing her naked breast in public while breastfeeding her child.  I would imagine few individuals would ever consider her doing so as "indecent exposure", but since we CAN imagine someone reacting in such a way, it has probably occurred and a statute was created in response.

But as with so many aspects of society, if only a small degree of rational thought was applied by ALL parties involved, such matters which transgress the boundaries of sanity could simply be avoided.


8-)

bernard baruch carman
* * *
Ron Paul 2012 • RonPaulWNC • LibertyAsheville
* * *
- truth seeker/seeder • SeedsOfTruth.org • ∞Liberty
infinity games ∞ audio/Mac specialist
∞∞∞


This article is a response to the "topless controversy" largely created by the efforts of "GoTopless" (.org) and its apparent agenda.

Local Asheville, NC coverage reference:

http://www.wlos.com/shared/news/top-stories/stories/wlos_vid_7964.shtml

Tuesday, July 17, 2012

How to Be a Crook


This is perhaps the best video I've seen which in only about 8 minutes explains perhaps the greatest THEFT in all of human history — a complex subject presented in a way that nearly anyone can understand.

Upon viewing, if you feel it is important as I do that as many people as possible understand how all current and future generations continue to be victims of this massive THEFT, please share this with everyone you can, because IMHO, this video needs to go viral!

8-)

bbc

———

How to Be a Crook
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2oHbwdNcHbc




Also noteworthy:


Tuesday, July 3, 2012

Wal-Mart VS. The Morons


"Independence Day"???  I'm not even sure what that means anymore... well, not here in Neo-Amerika anyway!

Let's see...

• We have gov't "ordinance enforcement officials" tearing up individuals' gardens, and federal enforcement officials destroying organic milk farms;

• We have local gov't "ordinance enforcement officials" forcing people out of perfectly safe homes, pushing homeowners into mortgage default & foreclosure;

• We have a continued lawless and dishonest banking & money system plummeting our economy into utter ruin while making politicians and their fat-cat corporatist friends wealthy;

• And now we have forced health care — OH, I'm sorry, a "new health care tax"!  YES, that's the ticket, a "TAX"!


... and the kicker?  This year Americans will again continue voting the same garbage into office they have for over 200 years!


But heck, it's still a "holiday", right?  So let's at least smile and be happy that we still have a little "freedom"... or so they tell me.

So in the wake of recent and continued idiotic governmental events, whereby apparently the masses of Americans still seem to believe that our government is the solution to the various financial hardships we're facing, this comical view on the reality of the situation seems most appropriate!

If nothing else, it's worth a read, a chuckle, and a forward!  8-)

Such humor is for us rather than the corrupted bureaucrats, as I have come to understand the overwhelming majority of them do not care about the American people whatsoever.  If they did, their actions would reflect it.

Thanks for sharing this, Pete!  (... please reconsider adopting me, so that i can move to Switzerland: an apparently far better run country!  ;-)

... oh yeah, and happy so called "Independence Day" — now THAT's a complete JOKE!

8-)

bernard baruch carman
* * *
Ron Paul 2012 • RonPaulWNC • LibertyAsheville
* * *
- truth seeker/seeder • SeedsOfTruth.org • ∞Liberty
infinity games ∞ audio/Mac specialist
∞∞∞





This should be read and understood by ALL Americans… Democrats, Republicans, Independents — EVERYONE, so PLEASE read to the end — IT'S VERY INTERESTING!!!

Wal-Mart VS. The Morons
1. Americans spend $36,000,000 at Wal-Mart Every hour of every day. 

2. This works out to $20,928 profit every minute! 

3. Wal-Mart will sell more from January 1 to St. Patrick's Day (March 17th) than Target sells all year. 

4. Wal-Mart is bigger than Home Depot + Kroger + Target +Sears + Costco + K-Mart combined. 

5. Wal-Mart employs 1.6 ACTUALLY IT IS NOW 2.1 million people, is the world's largest private employer, and most speak English. THE ONLY ENTITY WITH MORE EMPLOYEES IS THE US GOVT. 

6. Wal-Mart is the largest company in the history of the world. 

7. Wal-Mart now sells more food than Kroger and Safeway combined, and keep in mind they did this in only fifteen years. 

8. During this same period, 31 big supermarket chains sought bankruptcy. 

9. Wal-Mart now sells more food than any other store in the world. 

10. Wal-Mart has approx 3,900 stores in the USA of which 1,906 are Super Centers; this is 1,000 more than it had five years ago. 

11. This year 7.2 billion different purchasing experiences will occur at Wal-Mart stores. (Earth's population is approximately 6.5 Billion.) 

12.  90% of all Americans live within fifteen miles of a Wal-Mart.

You may think that I am complaining about "Wally-World", but I am really laying the ground work for suggesting that MAYBE we should hire the guys who run Wal-Mart to fix the economy!

To President Obama and all 535 voting members of the Legislatureit is now official that the majority of you are corrupt morons:
a. The U.S. Postal Service was established in 1775. You have had 234 years to get it right and it is broke. YET UPS IS THRIVING!

b. Social Security was established in 1935. You have had 74 years to get it right and it is broke. 

c. Fannie Mae was established in 1938. You have had 71 years to get it right and it is broke.

d. War on Poverty started in 1964. You have had 45 years to get it right; $1 trillion of our money is confiscated each year and transferred to "the poor" and they only want more. 

e. Medicare and Medicaid were established in 1965. You have had 44 years to get it right and they are broke. 

f. Freddie Mac was established in 1970. You have had 39 years to get it right and it is broke. 

g. The Department of Energy was created in 1977 to lessen our dependence on foreign oil. It has ballooned to 16,000 employees with a budget of $24 billion a year and we import more oil than ever before. You had 32 years to get it right and it is an abysmal failure.  I DON’T EVEN KNOW WHAT THEY ARE SUPPOSED TO BE DOING. 

Basically, you have FAILED in every "government service" you have shoved down our throats while overspending our tax dollars... 

YET, YOU WANT AMERICANS TO BELIEVE YOU CAN BE TRUSTED WITH A GOVERNMENT-RUN HEALTH CARE SYSTEM? 

Folks, keep this circulating. It is very well stated. Maybe it will end up in the e-mails of some of our “duly elected”, and since they never read anything (including most of the bills they pass into law) perhaps their staff will clue them in on how Americans feel.

99% of people won't forward this for various reasons, so I guess that makes me one of the 1%!  8-)


ADD YOUR OWN COMMENTS BELOW WHEN FORWARDING:

Someone please tell me what is wrong with all the people that run this country!!! 
We're “broke” & can't help our own Seniors, Veterans, Orphans, Homeless. etc., yet in just recent times we have provided aid to Haiti, Chile , and Turkey... and now Pakistan, previous home of bin Laden. Literally BILLIONS of DOLLARS!!! 

Our retired seniors living on a 'fixed income' receive no aid nor do they get any breaks! 

AMERICA:  A country where we have homeless without shelter, children going to bed hungry, elderly going without 'needed' meds, and mentally ill without treatment, etc... 

Imagine if the *GOVERNMENT* gave 'US' the same support they give to other countries.  Sad isn't it?
###