Collectivist NC Republicrats Violate Natural & Civil Law

In consideration of the following issues:

House committee kills medical marijuana bill

http://www.wral.com/house-committee-kills-medical-marijuana-bill/14539191/

Recapping Stimson Marijuana Trial

http://www.wlos.com/news/features/top-stories/stories/recapping-stimson-marijuana-trial-20291.shtml#.VRl3FFyDqMk

NC Senate bill would make childhood vaccinations mandatory

http://www.charlotteobserver.com/news/politics-government/article15370013.html

These reports perfectly exemplify the fundamental reason why people who champion the principles of liberty despise the actions of collectivist Republicans as much as collectivist Democrats for illegally voting away (usurping) the sacred natural rights granted to every individual by our Creator they personally do not agree with.

Such actions are illegal because no point of civil law can ever justly supersede any point of natural law.  While all public servants have taken an oath to obey the US Constitution which was constructed to protect the unalienable natural rights of all individuals and limit government power, they regularly elect to violate both natural law and our national supreme civil law regardless.  They don't even seem to understand that by doing so, they join company with tyrants like Hitler, Mussolini, and Nero who were all enemies of natural rights.

They also don't seem to recognize their political hypocrisy.  Such hypocrisy goes both ways, but for this example, Republicans will argue with Democrats that it's immoral to violate such sacred natural rights as self-armament by illegally voting to usurp it, but then turn around and illegally vote to usurp other sacred natural rights like personal choice of medicine and/or recreational drug use.

While these wicked tyrants are illegally sentencing innocent people to prison for merely exercising their sacred natural rights, they are simultaneously being bought off by special interests like BIG PHARMA so they can push more illegal "bipartisan" bills like forced vaccination of our children.

I wonder if these public servants think they can continue getting away with such actions of wickedness without ever being held accountable, if not by the corrupted Neo-Amerikan IN-Justice system, then by karma, or by the Creator.

8-)

bernard baruch carman
* * *
- truth seeker/seeder • SeedsOfTruth.org • ∞Liberty

- The Philosophy of Liberty • Give Me Liberty • Oath Keepers

- infinityGAMES ∞ audio/Mac specialist

∞ ∞ ∞

Exploring the Mindset of Authoritarian Collectivist Gun Control Nazis like Piers Morgan

Here’s a noteworthy piece, along with the various posted comments which follow that exemplify the mindset of authoritarian Collectivist gun control Nazis like Piers Morgan…

“Piers Morgan strangely silent about gun control laws in France”

http://twitchy.com/2015/01/07/piers-morgan-strangely-silent-about-gun-control-laws-in-france/

"In true American style, you demand things in black and white terms: either all, or nothing. You can't accept that the intermediary position is by far the most realistic."

— In general, I can agree with this statement.  However, when it comes to the violation of Natural Rights, there IS NO COMPROMISE — PERIOD!

"If you exercise a modicum of control over access to guns then the crimes associated with CIVILIAN gun ownership WILL recede.”

— This statement is, of course, completely in error.

Did Alcohol Prohibition in the 20's reduce alcohol consumption in the nation?  NO.  In fact, it increased AND gave birth or organized crime.

Has the so called "War on Drugs" reduced drug usage in "Neo-Amerika"?  NO.  In fact, this UN-Constitutional and anti-liberty "War on People" more easily allowed BIG PHARMA to drug the overwhelming majority of ALL Americans, including many children (which incidentally, nearly every mass shooter tragedy was on some sort of LEGAL mood altering drug).

“But the high school shootings, college massacres and other assorted carnivals of violence by legally entitled gun owners will continue too, unless steps are taken to limit access.”

— This statement is also, of course, completely in error.

An armed society is a polite society.  The only reason why wicked people know they have a greatly increased chance of successfully terminating the lives of many in such a violent attack is because they KNOW where people are most likely to be disarmed.

Gun Free Zones = Helpless Victim Zones

http://infinityliberty.blogspot.com/2012/12/gun-free-zones-helpless-victim-zones.html

Of course, fanatic terrorists won’t be as deterred by an armed populace as suicide is often part of their plan, but when they’re using firearms rather than bombs they also know that their plan has a far less chance of being as successful where there is greater chance of an armed citizenry.

“… your distasteful evocation of Nazism is wrongheaded and irrelevant.”

— Such reactions to those addressing the parallels between Nazism and Collectivism is almost NEVER irrelevant.  BEWARE proponents of “Godwin’s Law”: There be functioning brains here!  8-)

The Collectivist mindset of allowing a government in any way to violate our Natural Right to bear arms — equal to the tech level of military personnel — is the very same Collectivist mindset which Hitler used to gradually usurp the Natural Rights of Germany's citizens.  And contrary to typical Collectivist thinking, Hitler didn’t begin his reign of tyranny by throwing specific ethnic groups into ovens.  Rather, he began by GRADUALLY usurping the Natural Rights of the Individual, until the Right to Life was the only one remaining.  Therefore, citing Nazism with regard to matters where Natural Rights are violated is ALWAYS appropriate.

History proves without any shadow of doubt that freedom cannot be held by an unarmed populace.  Unarmed citizens will eventually be enslaved by some tyrant that rises to power, and/or terrorized by armed thugs (which largely happens only in Helpless Victim Zones).

“My point is that this article is exploitative, political point scoring trash, and utterly irrelevant to a European community directly affected by a vicious act of terrorism.”

— Says the same individual who stated the following in his post just prior:  “In a week in which a 2 year old shot child its mother in the face on your side of the pond, I know whose 'experiment' is working better.”

As if this sort of horrific tragedy occurs on any regular basis, apparently this individual doesn’t realize the hypocrisy he is exemplifying here?  8-)

“But I do resent your neo-imperialistic condemnation of OUR gun control laws and more viscerally, the cold-blooded capitalisation on tragedy to further an agenda that is ultimately just a paean to a capitalistic firearms industry cloaked as a means of maintaining personal security, with no moral deference to the deep and bloody individual cost.”

— Comical is citing “morality” while arguing for continued or increased violations upon the Natural Rights of the Individual!  8-)

From my perspective, the article merely points out the fact that authoritarian Collectivist gun control Nazis like Piers Morgan — and his ilk — are hypocrites.  When tragic events occur involving any firearm, they call for continued/increased violations of one’s sacred, unalienable, individual Natural Right to bear arms, ignoring ALL logic and recorded history and advancing their anti-Liberty agenda.  Yet, then when such a tragic event occurs in a place where the citizens’ Natural Right to bear personal armament is entirely usurped, they are silent because their argument has yet again been proven to be flawed.

Noteworthy, those who promote the violation of Natural Rights and take NO RESPONSIBILITY for doing so are enemies of Liberty, and therefore, enemies of ANY free people.  Around the time of the Sandy Hook tragedy (which many of us who are paying attention now believe was nothing more than a false flag event), one local individual of the overly Collectivist city of Asheville, NC in which I live had a major problem with the notion of accountability being placed upon those usurping Natural Rights through the force of the STATE.  Collectivists seem to enjoy the illegitimate power of usurping Natural Rights of the Individual through the force of the STATE without taking ANY responsibility for doing so.

Also noteworthy, people who criticize "Neo-Amerika" for being a "capitalistic nation" obviously have no clue what they are talking about.  This nation has not been capitalistic since at LEAST 1913.  For a nation to be considered Capitalistic, it would have to exemplify no government intervention in the marketplace.  How many markets in “Neo-Amerika” are not regulated and/or interfered with?  I cannot really think of any, other than perhaps the “black market”.

Again and again we witness the ongoing battle of political philosophy which has ABSOLUTELY NOTHING to do with the deceptive false paradigm of “Liberal/left VS Conservative/right” and EVERYTHING to do with Collectivism VS Individualism: The REAL Political-Philosophical Battle

(http://infinityliberty.blogspot.com/2014/11/collectivism-vs-individualism-real.html).

Let us continue to recognize and reveal the agenda of evil for what it is.

8-)

bernard baruch carman

* * *

- truth seeker/seeder • SeedsOfTruth.org • ∞Liberty

- The Philosophy of Liberty • Give Me Liberty • Oath Keepers

- infinityGAMES ∞ audio/Mac specialist

∞ ∞ ∞

State Constitutional Mandates Officials Believe in God

“This Constitutional requirement that an office holder must believe in God is a logical and consistent protection against those who might drive our Constitutional republic in a bad direction.”

— Jake MacAulay  (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iD0t6Ykv5DE)

James 2:

 18 But someone will say, “You have faith, and I have works.” Show me your faith without your works, and I will show you my faith by my works.

 19 You believe that there is one God. You do well. Even the demons believe--and tremble!

— NKJV Bible

As a follower of YHWH, I must question what so called “belief in God” really means when those who claim such “belief” violate the Natural Rights of Individuals which our Creator has granted to everyone?

Mr. MacAulay makes what sounds like a good argument for this “constitutional requirement” which some states have forced upon its People against their otherwise free will — that same free will that our Creator has granted each and every individual.

The irony here is that our so called “constitutional republic” has been driven in a bad direction from the near onset of America’s founding by so called “believers”.

For example, these same states which have such mandates in their constitutions were the very states which interfered in private contracts between individuals in marriage — a matter of CHURCH rather than STATE, thus violating the US Constitution.  In the early 1800’s, these states prohibited marriage between blacks & whites, thus violating their sacred Natural Rights.  Later on some of these states began granting “marriage licenses” allowing certain couples to bypass the prohibition.  Then of course the Federal Government violated the Natural Rights of ALL Americans by passing a national marriage act in the mid-20th century making STATE “licensing” a secular norm for this private matter of CHURCH.

And that’s just ONE example of how so called “believers” holding office have blatantly violated the sacred Natural Rights granted to every individual by their Creator — whatever “Creator” means to each individual.

The Word of God, the Bible, plainly states that even the demons believe in God, yet they engage in endless Godless acts.  As a matter of fact, this is certainly likewise for humans — both so called “believers” and “unbelievers”.

So what is more important: offices held by individuals who SAY they believe in a Supreme Being or by individuals who ACT as such?

Americans know full well the kind of people who SAY they are “believers” yet ACT against the sacred Natural Rights granted by our Creator.  We even have a name for such folk: “Hypocrites”.

We humans generally despise hypocrisy, and from my studies of the Bible God does too.  Hypocrisy of this particular type is often exhibited by the so called “Conservatives” within the Republican Party, which is why so many people today loathe it.  Likewise with the so called “Liberals” and their Democratic Party regarding a variety of other issues, an old native American might say, “American politicians speak with a forked tongue.”

But of course, these two “sides” have yet to recognize the fact that they’ve been deceived into believing the false political dichotomy which has been indoctrinated into the psyche of nearly every individual on the planet.  This amazingly powerful deception perpetuates an endless battle resultant only in tyranny, division, and failure through various adaptations of the Collectivist philosophy, into an otherwise Individualist nation exemplifying Liberty.  To learn more about this browse to my blogpost: Collectivism VS Individualism: The REAL Political-Philosophical Battle (http://infinityliberty.blogspot.com/2014/11/collectivism-vs-individualism-real.html).

The Colonial settlers escaping the British monarchy knew full well the tyranny exhibited by nations whose governments were mixed with certain authoritarian aspects of religion.  Such is why the American founders penned the Declaration of Independence by using the term “Creator” rather than “God” or “Jesus”.

Consider that the term “Creator” is far more inclusive and non-suggestive than the terms “God” & “Jesus”, which are even considered inaccurate at best and sinful at worst to many followers of YHWH.  “Creator” allows for the individual in a free secular society to consider individual perspectives regarding either a Supreme Being or nature itself in accordance with their own free will.

Also as a matter of fact, the Bible teaches that God gives free will to ALL so that they might choose blessing or cursing resultant from the WAY in which one walks.  One’s individual relationship with the Creator is personal and only governed by one’s own free will — it is not subject to the will of any other human being, although the vast majority of human-made churches would have one believe otherwise.

In the founding of America, the true concept that every individual of the human race — regardless of ethnicity, culture, or creed (aka: beliefs) — has Natural Rights was historically for the first time in such a way codified into its legal documents.  Further, the sole purpose for the establishment of such a government for this new nation of America was so that it would be under the Rule of Law to Protect Individual Natural Rights:

“We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness.--That to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed, --That whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government, laying its foundation on such principles and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their Safety and Happiness.”  — Declaration of Independence

So in TRUTH, these states which attempt to make it a requirement that a public servant of any kind believe in a Supreme Being do so by blatantly stepping beyond its legal US Constitutional limits and are in direct violation of our sacred Individual and Unalienable Natural Rights which were granted by our Creator.

Those who teach otherwise by either deception or ignorance do so in opposition to the will of our Creator, and therefore should give serious consideration to their own actions which are at enmity with our Creator.

8-)

bernard baruch carman

12/10/2014

∞ ∞ ∞

Collectivism VS Individualism: The REAL Political-Philosophical Battle

After years of emersion into the study of Liberty, I am convinced that the entire “Liberal/Left — Conservative/Right" political dichotomy is a completely deceptive paradigm, and one I now refer to as the Great Political Deception.  It is designed so to divide people into two false sides who would otherwise perhaps find common ground to solving problems through being rooted in the concept of the Protection of Unalienable Individual Natural Rights by Rule of Law.

Consider that the talking heads within the current political landscape use a host of terms like Socialism, Fascism, Authoritarianism, Statism, Corporatism, Nazisim, and every other kind of evil "ism”.  However the one “ism” which is almost never mentioned is Collectivism, which is the philosophy in which all of these evil “isms” are rooted.

To briefly digress, the economic system of Capitalism doesn’t fall under the philosophy of Collectivism.  A true free market is a byproduct of Individualism.  However, “Neo-Amerika” is NOT an example of a capitalistic economic system because there is little to no free market here.  Every market (except perhaps for the “black market”) is regulated to some degree by the STATE, and therefore, cannot be categorized as “Capitalism”.

However, most Americans still believe the false assumption that America is a Capitalistic nation regardless of how untrue this really is.  Likewise is the situation regarding the mass false assumption that the political “left — right” paradigm is actually true.

The terms “Liberal” & “Conservative” have been over time falsely crafted so that they appear as philosophies or ideologies, when in actuality they are not.  This deception distracts from the real battle of philosophies, which is Collectivism (leading to tyranny) VS Individualism (leading to liberty).

Unfortunately, both "sides" of the false political paradigm most often embrace the tenants of Collectivism without even knowing it.  Let’s explore these diametrically opposed philosophies that are rarely discussed in the contemporary deception political landscape.

Collectivism:

• the practice or principle of giving a group priority over each individual in it.

• the theory and practice of the ownership of land and the means of production by the people or the state.

The philosophy of Collectivism includes the social-political economic constructs of both socialism and fascism, though the grand political deception would have us believe that socialism is of the so called political “left” and fascism is of the so called political “right” in order to have the masses support one of two supposedly diametric paths of Collectivism which can only lead to slavery/tyranny.

Individualism:

• the habit or principle of being independent and self-reliant.

• a social theory favoring freedom of action for individuals over collective or state control.

The philosophy of Individualism is that in which the fundamental principles of liberty reside, and upon whose foundation the United States of America was built.  But of course, this is not taught in the government schools and why would it be, for doing so might challenge the status quo power of the STATE.

The philosophy of Individualism champions the free will of the individual endowed by our Creator (regardless of individual viewpoint).  By contrast, the philosophy of Collectivism prohibits the exercise of that free will which is displaced by the will of some collective.

Therefore: Collectivism leads to slavery/tyranny — Individualism leads to liberty.

This is not to say that every collective is at enmity with liberty.   However, a collective is at enmity with liberty to the degree it embraces and practices the philosophy of collectivism.

In considering the true meaning of the deceptive words “liberal” and “conservative”, it becomes clearer that no one can actually BE a “liberal” or “conservative”.  Correctly used, the words “liberal” and “conservative” are never nouns, but rather adjectives or adverbs.  Neither legitimate word meaning is rooted in any philosophy whatsoever.  Therefore, no one can be a “liberal” or be a “conservative” — on the contrary, one can only act liberally or conservatively with regard to a specific matter.

Simply put, “liberal” refers to being either more apt to change existing conditions of an institution or tradition, OR dealing abundantly in proportioning; “conservative” refers to being either more apt to preserve existing conditions of an institution or tradition, OR dealing cautiously moderate in proportioning.

However, the masses of recent centuries have been deceived into believing that there is a “liberal” VS a “conservative” philosophy or ideology, and that everyone must subscribe to either one or the other.

As a result, we are most often presented with two supposedly opposite sides of an issue having only two options, both most often being either inaccurate, immoral/unethical, illegal, or in violation of liberty, and neither of which actually solve the problem at hand.

One noteworthy example of this is the matter of “same sex marriage”.  Here the masses are presented with two opposing sides of this issue of which neither side will ever reach agreement or find any harmony, and BOTH sides’ positions are rooted in the philosophy of Collectivism.

The libertarian solution to the matter based in the philosophy of Individualism is simply to remove the STATE from the issue.  The STATE has no business — no just authority nor jurisdiction — interfering in contracts between free individuals, which includes the contract of marriage.  Marital status should NOT be any factor in tax legislation or anything else for that matter.

However, how often is THIS concept considered by the mainstream media, or the duopoly partisan talking heads?  The collectivists who run this nation do not really desire Americans to actually figure out how to solve problems, because that would unite us as individuals against them and their collectivist agenda which is at enmity with maximizing Liberty for all.

To most people such talk about political philosophies & ideologies seems unimportant.  However, I am convinced that understanding this Great Political Deception is paramount to re-uniting Americans around the goal of advancing Liberty through the Protection of Unalienable Individual Natural Rights by Rule of Law.

If we Americans who have come to understand this truth do not make a concerted effort to reveal this deception for what it is to the masses, then it will be nearly impossible for our younger generations to break out of the continued perpetuation of the various problems which plague our nation.

It is my goal to continue educating my fellow humans about this Great Political Deception in hopes that enough individuals will see through the deception for what it is and embrace the true ideology of Liberty, which is rooted in the philosophy of Individualism.

One good place to begin this educational process is by watching this very good & short video entitled “The Philosophy of Liberty”:  https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=muHg86Mys7I

If you think I’m entirely off base with what I’m sharing here, then perhaps consider bending an ear to this gent:  G. Edward Griffen - Discusses the False Left Right Paradigm

In Liberty… 

8-)

bernard baruch carman

* * *

- truth seeker/seeder • SeedsOfTruth.org • ∞Liberty

- The Philosophy of Liberty • Give Me Liberty • Oath Keepers

- infinityGAMES ∞ audio/Mac specialist

∞ ∞ ∞

Is NC ready for Health, Prosperity & LIBERTY?

Greetings NC Legislators!

Receiving a recent email from John Dudley of Americans for Prosperity caused me to consider a few thoughts that I am compelled to share with you all.

In regards to his concerns, I certainly hope this move toward extracting natural gas in NC will be done in a way that is safe for all of us.  Being a libertarian, I'm a proponent of maximizing the free market — but not at the expense of violating the natural rights of others to do so, and pollution is one form of doing so.  I have a difficult time believing that there is no safe and effective method of extracting natural gas.

But I have a major problem with both special interest groups and certainly with our elected officials with regard to playing the "blame game" in this so called "left" VS "right" nonsensical paradigm.  I continue to find that both "sides" of the political duopoly are often perfectly willing to violate the natural rights of individuals.

Case in point:  Why does it seem that thus far there are only Democrats stepping up to the plate in support of H1161 (the medical marijuana bill)?

It would seem that there would be at least a handful of Republicans in our NC State Legislature who might be a proponent of:

• Creating new jobs in non-government markets;

• Fostering new small businesses;

• Raising revenue without raising taxes;

• Keeping NC from economically falling further behind other states (like SC, for example) whose legislatures have recently voted to RE-legalized both industrial hemp AND medical marijuana;

• RE-etablishing the individual natural right to seek health remedies outside of Obamacare and the "Medical Industrial Complex";

• Taking a step toward Ending the War on Drugs People who find marijuana as enjoyable as alcohol yet far safer.

And Democrats reading this message, please don't think you're off the hook in any of this.  Why have you given your supporters such hope during election times, yet sat idly by doing absolutely nothing to move the medical marijuana initiative forward for what, 70+ years that you've been in power over the NC Legislature?

Only now that Republicans have gained control in NC do SOME Democrats finally make any effort to support the health, prosperity and LIBERTY of NC residents through such an initiative — and those who are doing so, THANK YOU!

But being privy to political gaming I also have to wonder... knowing that by and large Republicans have been seemingly more pro-prohibition (in recent years anyway, in spite that the Democrats instituted Prohibition in the 20's), might these recent actions be merely yet another example of such a political stunt whereby Democrats are wagering they might be able to point their collectivist finger at Republicans for not caring about our health, prosperity and liberty, in hopes of regaining their helm of control over the NC Legislature over future elections?  As if We North Carolinians are completely ignorant of the fact that the Democrats have done nothing in this effort all these decades.

I certainly hope this is not the case, because I have two friends now that have been diagnosed with terminal cancer – one pancreatic and one brain cancer.  I also just became privy to the information about Simpson-cannabis oil (http://www.simpson-oil.com/index.html) and how it has served to cure thousands of people who were diagnosed with terminal cancer.  In fact, a friend of mine knows someone who upon being diagnosed as such with brain cancer, began the Simpson treatment and after only months his brain tumors were gone and is still living to this day with his family.

Make no mistake, to the extent NC Legislators resist the RE-legalization of medical marijuana, is the degree to which they are sealing the fate of terminal cancer patients.  It's as if these legislators DESIRE for North Carolinians to be unhealthy, and I cannot understand how such people can even sleep at night knowing that they are part of the cause for so many people's death without giving them their natural right to seek alternatives to the barbaric corporation/government mandated method of cancer (and other) treatments.

Further, to the extent NC Legislators resist the RE-legalization of marijuana and industrial hemp in general, is the degree to which they are stifling prosperity and liberty in NC.

What will it take to remedy this Draconian situation?  Must North Carolinians create an unaffiliated PAC which will be a watchdog for all legislators who refuse to improve the health, prosperity and liberty of those who reside in our state?

Because if it takes replacing those among the NC Legislature with representatives who actually care about the well being of North Carolinians, then we will easily do so at the ballot box, because we all know that there are far more people in NC — Unaffiliated, Republicans, Democrats, & Libertarians — who are for health, prosperity & liberty, than there are against.

The proverbial ball is now in your court...

8-)

bernard baruch carman

* * *

- truth seeker/seeder • SeedsOfTruth.org • ∞Liberty

- The Philosophy of Liberty • Give Me Liberty • Oath Keepers

- infinityGAMES ∞ audio/Mac specialist

∞ ∞ ∞

Memorial Day Thoughts

Christian cop loses appeal – must attend mosque

http://www.wnd.com/2014/05/judges-ok-decision-to-order-police-to-attend-mosque/#fqJwrjQdhhRs4FAM.99

———

Not surprising at all when considering that the "Neo-Amerikan" IN-justice system cares not about natural rights & liberty. The gov't school system & controlled media has done such a great job of indoctrinating the masses into Collectivist philosophy, that they largely believe people are to obey most any decision made by the three corrupt branches of gov't.

I likened such tyrannical actions to those of Nazi Germany the other day & a friend of mine became offended and now assumed I'm entirely ignorant. He is a perfect example of how people commonly believe it's ok to vote away ones natural rights and that the only recourse Americans should have is our vote -- our vote in an entirely corrupt election process. But of course, he doesn't believe the corruption is as great as I know it to be.

Of course, he doesn't have my experience either. After being very engaged throughout the Ron Paul 2008 & 2012 races, I KNOW how the entire process is fully corrupted from the media picking the "top tier" contenders, to the fraud committed within the partisan duopoly breaking it's own legally bound election/convention rules, to the plurality voting system which mandates a two party only system.

But beyond this, he -- certainly like many others -- cannot see the similarities present in "Neo-Amerika" to that of Nazi Germany. Apparently, unless the death toll of innocents must reach the millions before any nation can be likened to Naziism. Apparently all the deaths due to the various endless wars Neo-Amerika wages, like the "War on Drugs" for example, hasn't taken enough lives yet to earn a title likened to "Nazi". And in spite of all the various examples of police brutality with impunity doesn't also ring a bell.

I attempted to explain that my comment was more about DIRECTION. I also tried to explain that all those evil "isms" -- Socialism, Communism, Fascism, etc. -- all fall under the philosophy of Collectivism and lead to nothing but totalitarianism like Nazi Germany.

But no... I'm the one who needs to better educate myself because I don't know what I am talking about! 8-)

Everything is just fine here. There is no growing militarized police state. There is no cartel of central banks who perpetuate debt/poverty among the masses who can take your property with no accountability whatsoever. The JFK Assassination, Waco, Ruby Ridge, the OK City bombing, and 9/11 all happened the way the rulers say they did -- because they never lie. The people of CN are dangerous for responding the way they did when the Gov threatened to take away their firearms. And the ranchers in NV are domestic terrorists for arming themselves in attempts to protect their financial security from a handful of bureaucrats and the Nine Wraith Judges in Mordor (D.C.).  -- This is what I'm being asked of my fellow Americans to believe...?

Today we honor all those who serve & who have served in the American armed forces -- those who took an oath to protect & defend the sacred natural rights of all individuals and to uphold the Constitution which legally guarantees those rights and limits the power of the State.

But if the State has grown corrupt to the point where it no longer serves to fulfill such duties, then what kind of nation does our armed forces truly serve?

The public servants who act as lords over We the People through massive corruption do a great disservice to those in our armed forces who put their lives on the line for our liberty. Most men & women who serve are fresh out of the Collectivist indoctrination factories we call "High School", so it is very difficult for them to fully understand how they are often being used as military pawns for the globalists to advance their agenda.

It is up to the People of this nation to break out of the Collectivist indoctrination, see through its deception, and embrace Individualist philosophy whose fruit is liberty... and then help others see the beautiful light of liberty granted to us by our Creator.

We the People are NOT owned by the State, nor should we ever bow down to obey (and therefore worship) any State as a god.

This is my Memorial Day prayer -- that We the People honor all those who put their lives on the line for our sacred & natural rights by pledging to educate ourselves more about the philosophy of liberty, and share this most blessed gift with others.

Godbless LIBERTY!

Check out the short "Philosophy of Liberty" video here:

8-)

bernard baruch carman

* * *

- truth seeker/seeder • SeedsOfTruth.org • ∞Liberty

- The Philosophy of Liberty • Give Me Liberty • Oath Keepers

- infinityGAMES ∞ audio/Mac specialist

∞ ∞ ∞

Civitas Media Honors Privacy

Statement from the CEO

Civitas Media never had any plans or intentions of publishing in print or online lists of holders of “conceal and carry” permits.  Nor will Civitas Media develop databases of permit holders.  A poorly crafted internal memo meant to highlight editorial discussions and planning incorrectly indicated that such a database was being planned; it has been considered and rejected.

Michael C. Bush, CEO

http://civitasmedia.com

———

Dear Mchael C. Bush, Civitas Media CEO,

I just wanted to write to say thank you for rejecting the horrible violation of privacy which someone in your organization considered with regard to publishing personal and private information of "conceal and carry" permit holders.

I hope this incident will also provide an opportunity for educating perhaps the younger members of your staff regarding the importance of upholding the right to privacy, as granted to each and every individual by his Creator.

While the ever changing American government enacts moot attempts to minimize crime, it is worth considering that we who have complied with its illegal and immoral demands to be 'permitted' for what is really a natural right have done so against our will — we would have never voluntarily given the State such private information.

As with each and every violation of natural rights, there are always negative consequences.  For example, due to the State's mandate of issuing "conceal and carry" permits and building a database of such records, some people have become confused thinking that "public records" are those which everyone has a right to access, but of course, this is not the case.  Americans also give the State personal and private financial data against our will, but no "Transparency Act" can give the general public the right to access such data.

Further, the consequences of anyone publishing such data could certainly include the criminal targeting of homes for theft where firearms likely reside, and/or criminal targeting of homes whose owners might not have such defenses.

Certainly, most people would not have the intention to put innocent Americans at risk of burglary or worse, but without giving heed to the importance of protecting our natural rights, as history continues to show, negative consequences are inevitable.

Thank you again for honoring the right to privacy of Americans.  I can only hope such examples as yours will help others act accordingly.

8-)

bernard baruch carman

* * *

- truth seeker/seeder • SeedsOfTruth.org • ∞Liberty

- The Philosophy of Liberty • Give Me Liberty • Oath Keepers

- infinityGAMES ∞ audio/Mac specialist

∞ ∞ ∞

Considering Election/Voting Fraud

All this debate over voting identification, yet it's only the tip of the iceberg regarding "election/voting fraud".

To being with, the voting system itself — the plurality voting system — perpetuates a duopoly partisan system by introducing the spoiler effect, candidate cloning, and the wasted vote syndrome (see RangeVoting.org to learn more).

Next, we have black box voting in various states, which is not only often in violation of State Constitutions, but has been shown to be unreliable at best and rigged at worst (check out HBO's "Hacking Democracy"  http://www.hackingdemocracy.com ).

Then there is the "debate" folly.  If anyone actually thinks the "debates" aren't controlled in a way to prevent non-duopoly candidates from being involved, while crafting the Q's & A's to make crooks and liars look good to the American voters… then perhaps you should not vote anyway!  8-)  (or perhaps you should watch "Who's Afraid of an Open Debate?"  https://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=1NXhoP5bQ2M#! )

And let's not forget about the media, who begins selecting "top tier" candidates in the Primary race nearly a year before the public does, thus leading ignorant voters.  In some cases "journalists/reporters" have blatantly stated to the public that certain candidates cannot win.  Some news networks have even altered or omitted data as election results were reported.

Regardless of all, people don't turn out for the most important election anyway — the Primaries — when there is a chance of beating the "establishment Republicrat" (you know, the duopoly candidate that the political party helps to win).  People only really turn out for the General election when they can ONLY vote for ONE authoritarian collectivist or the OTHER (evil VS evil).

Yet, the foolish debate over voting identification goes on.

Perhaps the masses deserve to continue playing the fool if their votes can be so blatantly manipulated in such a corrupted election system, when all they can focus on in this matter is voter identification.

More Fool We.

8-)

bernard baruch carman

* * *

- truth seeker/seeder • SeedsOfTruth.org • ∞Liberty

- The Philosophy of Liberty • Give Me Liberty • Oath Keepers

- infinityGAMES ∞ audio/Mac specialist

∞ ∞ ∞

Trayvon & Zimmerman Tragedy

My thoughts regarding the Trayvon & Zimmerman tragedy are perhaps best conveyed through an online dialog I had at Huffington Post:

Ted Nugent 'Racist,' Should Be Kicked Off NRA Board Of Directors, Gun Control Group's Petition Says

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/07/24/ted-nugent-racist_n_3646681.html?show_comment_id=271941657#comment_271941657

My posted comment:

how is “dope smoking, racist gangsta wannabe" a racist statement, yet "white cracker" isn't?

the only thing Nugent is off base in criticizing here are people who smoke marijuana — apparently a major flaw in his understanding of liberty.

the people among the pathetic media who call themselves "journalists" are the ones that should be REMOVED from their positions for continually feeding into the political BS that is dividing this country.

and the sheeple who buy all the media BS should get a clue, but they don't. perhaps they believe it's "NORMAL" to use photos of the "victim" at 13 years of age in order to gain sympathy.

the Trayvon-Zimmerman matter has again proven that whenever it's convenient for the authoritarian collectivists to sidestep the heart of an issue, they will — this time under the guise of "racism", when that wasn't even a factor in the entire tragedy... a tragedy which could have been avoided if Trayvon had communicated to Zimmerman, rather than electing to set up an ambush.

violence begets violence. i just hope others learn from this incident that it's NEVER OK to attack someone, even if being followed.

i carry nearly all of the time. if someone ever attacks me, i won't hesitate to protect myself... PERIOD!

so keep sleeping if you want to Neo-Amerian Sheeple! ZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZ.... 8-)

One commenter replied:

Quote: "a tragedy which could have been avoided if Trayvon had communicated to Zimmerman, rather than electing to set up an ambush." 

Really? Despite no witness backing this up, you know this is what happened because why? Solely based on Zimmerman claim that this is what happened. How about, a tragedy which could have been avoided if Zimmerman had stayed in his car and obeyed the dispatcher who told him not to follow Martin? And as for violence begetting violence, what about Zimmerman’s past including, regular use of Racial Slurs, Domestic Abuse, and Resisting Arrest? He is an “Angel” though, right?

My response:

of course, i don't *know* exactly what happened.  and let's face facts, neither of these guys were "angels".  but i can only make conclusions based upon those few facts which were evidenced.

for example, based upon the initial phone conversation with the police, it appears to be fairly obvious to me that Zimmerman's intent was never to hurt anyone, otherwise he wouldn't have called the police to begin with.  he was apparently concerned about the recurring theft that was going on in the neighborhood, and perhaps the safety of his uncle, and wanted the police to get there ASAP.

… or he was acting the entire time, having the true intent of taking a life that night.

he also apparently didn't want a potential thief suspect to get away without being questioned by the police.  i would feel likewise, as there have been a string of scooters stolen in my neighborhood — two of which from my property — and we've had continued recent visits from "gangsta wannabe's" casing my property since.  thieves SHOULD BE afraid of being shot when trespassing.

personally, i would have shouted at such a suspect in order to ascertain his intent while on the phone with the police.  and yes, the entire tragedy might have been avoided.  but then again, do we know if the two men didn't have some such words that weren't recorded?  regardless, Zimmerman doesn't deserve to go to prison for lack of communication.

aside from Zimmerman's apparent intent, if Trayvon was simply on his way home, why didn't he get there in four minutes?  what was HIS intent once he realized a "creepy ass white cracker" was following him?  did he decide that he was upset enough for being followed that he chose some other course of action other than returning home?  what other course of action could that have been?  if Trayvon felt threatened at any point during that time, why didn't he leave?

these among other points cause me to conclude that Zimmerman was trying to keep tabs on where Trayvon was until the police got there.  Trayvon had ample time to leave the scene, yet elected an alternate course of action — to attack Zimmerman.

regardless, if there is not enough evidence to convict Zimmerman otherwise, innocence must be presumed.

but of course, most of what we're discussing is off topic to this article.

i just hope and pray that this tragedy saves lives in the future by giving cause for pause to those who would think about assaulting, thieving, or otherwise violate the natural rights of others.

8-)

bbc

∞∞∞

Small Acts of Kindness and Love

While watching the Hobbit recently, this quote really seemed noteworthy regarding much of what i often struggle with.  Too bad I haven't applied heeding it more over the past couple of weeks, for I might not have allowed myself to become so struck with overwhelm, negativity and the feeling of self-uselessness:

"Gandalf: Saruman believes it is only great power that can hold evil in check, but that is not what I have found. I found it is the small everyday deeds of ordinary folk that keep the darkness at bay. Small acts of kindness and love."

We might be very surprised if we knew just how far our small acts of kindness and love go, while we continue to remain in our varying degrees of personal misery worrying about however we feel our 'large acts of greatness' might be falling short.

8-)

IRS Targeting VS Targeting the IRS

Regarding the "IRS Targeting" issue, I received an email today from a Michigan Congressman (below my signature).  I shared with him and our Liberty Asheville network my first thoughts that came to mind...

Dr. Dan Benishek asks, "Do you think the President knew about targeting of conservative groups by the IRS?"

Well, that's a largely irrelevant question, isn't it?

A more relevant question is, "Why is America still plagued with an 'income' tax system which violates the natural right of privacy?"

Or, "How can any individual be 'free' in such an authoritarian collectivist social-economic environment that prohibits privacy?"

The founders made it explicitly clear that there should be NO direct tax placed upon a free individual (US Constitution, Article I, Section 9, Clause 4), yet American generations have allowed a limited government to grow more unlimited and simultaneously violate the law of the land and our natural rights in this area (along with many others) for about a century now.

If we entirely eliminated all direct taxes, no one in the gov't system could ever use taxation as a means to target any specific individual or group of individuals.

Oh, and we'd restore our unalienable natural individual right to privacy.

Seems like a no-brainer, eh?

8-)

bernard baruch carman

* * *

- truth seeker/seeder • SeedsOfTruth.org • ∞Liberty

- The Philosophy of Liberty • Give Me Liberty • Oath Keepers

- infinityGAMES ∞ audio/Mac specialist

∞ ∞ ∞

On May 20, 2013, at 2:33 PM, Dan Benishek <Updates@DanBenishek.com> wrote:

Friend -- I am writing to ask for a few minutes of your time to let me know what you think by filling out a short survey. Hearing from you is an important part of representing Americans and my fellow Michiganders in the First District. I value this opportunity to learn your opinions, ideas and concerns. Do you think the President knew about targeting of conservative groups by the IRS? Please take a moment to share your thoughts by filing out this survey. Thank you for your time and interest.  I appreciate hearing from you today and I look forward to hearing from you again in the future.   Best wishes, Dan Benishek http://www.danbenishek.com/ Re-Elect Dr Dan Benishek · United States This email was sent to bbc@infinitygames.com. To stop receiving emails, click here. You can also keep up with Dan Benishek on Twitter or Facebook. Paid for by Benishek for Congress

Anti-Gun Lunacy Teaches Students to LIE

Dear Pat McCrory:

SERIOUSLY???  THIS is the level our Public School Administrations have stopped to???

This is yet another reason why ALL anti-gun nuts should be ousted from ANY public office, and why anti-liberty legislation like "zero-tolerance" and "mandatory minimums" should be eliminated immediately!!!

While Cole Withrow strives to continue his HS graduation plans, he and all his friends are now getting an education in the anti-liberty evils of authoritarian collectivism that has permeated the STATE.  Rather than commending the boy for doing the RIGHT thing, he is punished for it, thereby teaching the entire student body to LIE.

EVERY such incident needs to be handled on an individual basis, with NO "zero-tolerance" and NO "mandatory minimums" being a factor in the judgement.  But that would require the usage of BRIANS, which apparently isn't common among many people in public offices.

Heck, if the school's principle had a brain he would have simply allowed the boy to take the shotgun home and return to school, or simply just leave it locked up in his automobile.  Or better yet, lock it up somewhere inaccessible to the students just in case a mass shooter decided that day to take advantage of our Federally mandated Helpless Victim Zones (aka: Gun Free Zones).

But of course, treating individuals individually AS individuals would also mandate those public officials who HAVE brains be freed from the collectivist brainwashing they've received their entire lives via the public school system and mass media.  Evil legislation like "zero-tolerance" and "mandatory minimums" exist BECAUSE authoritarian collectivist philosophy has become the norm in what I call "Neo-Amerika"… what America has become.

Thankfully, something good has come out of the evil actions of the school board: CHEERS to Liberty University for making a stand for liberty and rewarding this boy for acting honestly, justly and thoughtfully!

Liberty Univ. Offers Scholarship to Eagle Scout Facing Gun Charges

http://radio.foxnews.com/toddstarnes/top-stories/liberty-univ-offers-scholarship-to-eagle-scout-facing-gun-charges.html

SCORE ONE MORE VICTORY FOR LIBERTY, ONE MORE LOSS FOR TYRANNY!

Now it's YOUR turn, Mr. Governor, to choose a side: tyranny or LIBERTY… which will it be?

8-)

bernard baruch carman

* * *

- truth seeker/seeder • SeedsOfTruth.org • ∞Liberty

- The Philosophy of Liberty • Give Me Liberty • Oath Keepers

- infinityGAMES ∞ audio/Mac specialist

∞ ∞ ∞

Petitions for Cole — PLEASE SHARE:

Petitioning The Governor of NC — Johnston County Schools: Cancel the Expulsion of Cole Withrow

http://www.change.org/petitions/johnston-county-schools-cancel-the-expulsion-of-cole-withrow?utm_campaign=new_signature&utm_medium=email&utm_source=signature_receipt#share

Petitioning Dr. Ed Croom — PRINCETON HIGH SCHOOL: FREE COLE! (Cole Withrow)

http://www.change.org/petitions/princeton-high-school-free-cole-cole-withrow?utm_campaign=new_signature&utm_medium=email&utm_source=signature_receipt#share

Email the Governor of NC, Pat McCrory

http://www.governor.state.nc.us/contact/email-pat

###