Biased "Liberal" & "Conservative" Media

with all the biased comments thrown around against "biased conservative media" by the "liberals", this is certainly noteworthy.

this underlines the point i have been striving to make in blog posts like yesterday's, “Which Political Party Will Fix America?”:

both the RED & BLUE political camps have been hijacked by tyrannical authoritarians -- RED generally seems to lean fascist & BLUE generally seems to lean socialist. BOTH camps, exemplified by their very actions throughout the past Century of American history, are enemies to liberty.

in this particular case, MSNBC is caught blue handed in a blatantly obvious crafted deception, designed for no other reason to instigate racial tension, giving the impression that there are a bunch of "white people" showing up to Obama events.

the majority of Americans who have been brainwashed into believing the BLUE socialist-authoritarian party is actually a good thing for this country, will go away from watching this broadcast being confirmed in their deceptive belief that all those who are standing up for liberty against the fools running "America" into the ground are merely a bunch of white racists.

of course, the same exact thing occurs to the brainwashed RED fascist-authoritarian party supporters as a result of their preferred biased media source as well.

however, i don't think i have personally witnessed from any biased mainstream news network such a blatant attempt of deception, going through great pains in editing a video with the sole purpose of hiding the truth of the matter: that the guy with the assault rifle in the audience at the Obama event is BLACK!

i suggest to Americans of both camps that they turn OFF their boob-tube biased and deceptive news media sources, and seek out true news via the internet.

in liberty,

8-)

bernard baruch carman

- seeker of truth / seeder of truth • SeedsOfTruth.org • ∞Liberty

- BornToWin.net • FellowshipOfTheWord.org

- We The People • Oath Keepers • LibertyAsheville • State of America

- infinity games ∞ infinity solutions ∞ audio/Mac specialist

•••

in response to:

Media Bias Proof: MSNBC Turns Black People Into White People

http://snipr.com/qnjmm

Perhaps the headline above should red MSNBC turns blacks and whites against each other. In the clip below MSNBC reports on the gun carrying "racists" at Obama's town hall meetings. The footage they show of the man carrying the rifle does not reveal the man's face nor skin color. The man is black. The reason they choose these camera angles becomes obvious as the report unfolds. Revealing the man's race would not fit their version of the story. They'd look idiotic if they talked about all these "white people" carrying guns at Obama events if the one they showed was actually black. As it turns out they look not only idiotic but extremely biased.

Which Political Party Will Fix America?

you know i cannot resist stepping up on my soapbox for a moment to comment when i receive emails like this one i received today called "Our Social Security Eye Opener," which suggests that various economic evils America continues to face originated only in Democratic leadership.

yes, i'm mostly certain the data regarding the Social Security system fiasco being attributed to the Democratic Party is largely true. however, the SS system is not the only ill-conceived, ill-administered, and Constitutionally ill-legal government ponzi scheme enacted over the last Century or so.

but let me get the point of the email straight... so, all i have to do is vote "Republican" from now on and the Federal, State, & local governments will stop transgressing the Unalienable Rights of the Individual, the Constitution (Law of the Land), and actually allow for a free market to exist and liberty to thrive? really?!? ;-)

let me see... who was President when the first "Income Tax" was passed (Revenue Act of 1861) -- perhaps the most unethical and immoral tax known to man which deprives the individual of his unalienable right to privacy?

... oh, it was Abraham Lincoln, a REPUBLICAN! 8-)

and who was President when the Sixteenth Amendment was ratified on Feb 3, 1913, locking in place this evil new tax system which would grow over the Century into a 9+ Million word tax code of deception?

... oh, it was William Taft, a REPUBLICAN! 8-)

and shall we mention the myriad of Constitutional transgressions of another more recent corrupt REPUBLICAN Presidential administration, known to many as just "W"?

let's face the TRUTH: authoritarian tyrants really don't care which partisan letter, "D" or "R", resides next to their names. authoritarian tyrants merely desire power & wealth.

the large majority of Americans since the American Revolution are continuously deceived into continuing down the same old path of destruction, over and over again. We the People continue to elect the same types of people who belong to secret societies, and hob knob with a gang of elitist globalist who only benefit socialist and/or fascist agendas.

if you haven't yet done so, first watch "I.O.U.S.A." (the movie), and then if you dare, watch "The Obama Deception", by Alex Jones (horrible and inaccurate title, but great eye opening movie).

if We the People really want to do something to turn the tide of the tyrannical War on Liberty, besides dispensing with partisan politics and advancing liberty minded candidates, we need to stop looking toward a political party to fix America.

it would be most savvy to continue educating oneself in regards to the philosophy of liberty and encouraging others to do likewise.

the liberty activism groups i currently believe are most paramount to the never ending fight for liberty are: We The People & Oath Keepers, both of which are taking a different tack than the typical partisan political approach.

"Insanity: doing the same thing over and over again and expecting different results." -- Albert Einstein

in liberty,

8-)

bernard baruch carman

- seeker of truth / seeder of truth • SeedsOfTruth.org • ∞Liberty

- BornToWin.net • FellowshipOfTheWord.org

- We The People • Oath Keepers • LibertyAsheville • State of America

- infinity games ∞ infinity solutions ∞ audio/Mac specialist

•••

in response to:

Subject: Fw: OUR SOCIAL SECURITY Eye Opener

I USED TO LAUGH WHEN MY FATHER, DEMOCRAT, TOLD ME, “SON, IT MAY BE SOCIAL BUT IT IS NOT SECURITY.” THAT WAS WAY BACK IN THE LATE 40”S, SOUNDED FUNNY, GOOD FOR A LAUGH. NOT NOW!!!

MY FATHER, WAS A PASSENGER CONDUCTOR ON THE NEW YORK CENTRAL RAILROAD. BACK IN THE 50’S CONGRESS, MOSTLY DEMOCRATS, VOTED TO TAKE OVER THE RAILROAD RETIREMENT FUND. WHICH THEY DID. SHORTLY AFTER THIS TAKE OVER MY FATHER BECAME A REGISTERED REPUBLICAN.

Our Social Security

Franklin Delano Roosevelt (Terms of Office March 4, 1933, to April 12, 1945), a Democrat, introduced the Social Security (FICA) Program.. He Promised:

1.) That participation in the Program would be Completely voluntary,

2.) That the participants would only have to pay 1% of the first $1,400 of their annual Incomes into the Program,

3.) That the money the participants elected to put Into the Program would be deductible from Their income for tax purposes each year,

4.) That the money the participants put into the Independent ‘Trust Fund’ rather than into the General operating fund, and therefore, would Only be used to fund the Social Security Retirement Program, and no other Government program, and

5.) That the annuity payments to the retirees would never be taxed as income.

Since many of us have paid into FICA for years and are now receiving a Social Security check every month -- and then finding that we are getting taxedon 85% of the money we paid to the Federal government to ‘Put Away’ -- you may be interested in the following:

Question: Which Political Party took Social Security from the Independent ‘Trust Fund’ and put it into the General Fund so that Congress could spend it?

Answer: It was Lyndon B. Johnson (Democrat, Term of Office: November 22, 1963 to January 20, 1969) and the Democratically Controlled House and Senate.

Question: Which Political Party eliminated the income tax Deduction for Social Security (FICA) withholding?

Answer: The Democratic Party.

Question: Which Political Party started taxing Social Security annuities?

Answer: The Democratic Party, with Albert Arnold Gore, Jr. (Al Gore) [Vice President Term of Office: January 10, 1993 to January 20, 2001] casting the ‘tie-breaking’ deciding vote as President of the Senate, while he was Vice President of the US.

AND MY FAVORITE:

Question: Which Political Party decided to start giving Annuity payments to immigrants?

Answer: That’s right! JAMES (JIMMY) EARL CARTER, JR. (DEMOCRAT, TERM OF OFFICE: JANUARY 20, 1977 TO JANUARY 20, 1981 AND THE DEMOCRATIC PARTY. IMMIGRANTS MOVED INTO THIS COUNTRY, AND AT AGE 65, BEGAN TO RECEIVE SOCIAL SECURITY PAYMENTS: THE DEMOCRATIC PARTY GAVE THESE PAYMENTS TO THEM, EVEN THOUGH THEY NEVER PAID A DIME INTO IT!

Then, after violating the original contract (FICA), the Democrats turn around and tell you that the Republicans want to take your Social Security away! And the worst part about it is uninformed citizens believe it!

If enough people receive this, maybe a seed of Awareness will be planted and maybe changes WILL evolve! Maybe not, some Democrats are awfully sure of what isn’t so. But it’s worth a try. How many people can YOU send this to? Actions speak louder than bumper stickers. AND CONGRESS GIVES THEMSELVES 100% RETIREMENT FOR ONLY SERVING ONE TERM!!!

Bob Schulz of We the People Congress & Foundation on FreedomWatch with Judge Napolitano

Please take a moment to check out Judge Napolitano's show FreedomWatch webcast this Wed, Aug 12 @ 2 PM.

THIS WEEK the Judge will interview guest Bob Schulz of We the People Congress & Foundation, who is organizing the 2009 Continental Congress to be held November 9th ~ 22nd at the Pheasant Run Convention Center, St. Charles, IL.

if you have not yet heard Bob's CC2009 presentation citing various reasons as to why this matter is paramount, you can listen to this 80 minute mp3 audio i edited here: State of America

(if you miss the show, you can watch it later on their archives)

ALSO...

Please sign the petition, urging Fox News to add "Freedom Watch w/ Judge Napolitano" to their TV lineup, in addition to their internet channel. < http://freedomwatchonfox.com/sign-the-petition/ >

IMHO, this is the only news show i've seen which remains focused on mandating Constitutionally limited government, and therefore it needs to be on regular TV.

please pass this on to everyone you know... thanks!

in liberty,

8-)

bernard baruch carman

- seeker of truth / seeder of truth • SeedsOfTruth.org • ∞Liberty

- BornToWin.net • FellowshipOfTheWord.org

- We The People • Oath Keepers • LibertyAsheville • State of America

- infinity games ∞ infinity solutions ∞ audio/Mac specialist

•••

Cash for Hummers

LOL! yet another example of why the government has no business whatsoever in the marketplace. isn't it ironic that the "American" government seems to have barely a clue as to the purpose of government?

in this case, some clueless governing authorities thought it was a good idea to introduce this "Cash for Clunkers" plan. now here's a real no brainer! does Congress actually get paid for their "work"?

for the life of me, i cannot understand how this is supposed to help the environment, when the autos being traded in are just going to be resold to someone else, and the person trading in their SUV will most likely replace it with another SUV because they just might need/want an SUV... DUH! 8-)

this plan sounds about as smart as introducing government subsidies for any auto manufacturer pushing one of the latest fads, hybrid cars, which have huge batteries that cost mega bucks to replace every few years or so, and then contaminate the landfills.

i think We the People might be better off if the Federal Government was run by Looney Toons! 8-)

the authoritarian control freaks (socialists & fascists) have been advancing government control over the "free market" (which arguably, America hasn't had since... ?) in nearly every aspect of private life. coming soon will be another move toward complete control over the individual's health freedoms.

i wonder if there is any area of private life which has not yet been infringed upon... i cannot think of one, can YOU?

8-)

bernard baruch carman

- seeker of truth / seeder of truth • SeedsOfTruth.org • ∞Liberty

- BornToWin.net • FellowshipOfTheWord.org

- We The People • Oath Keepers • LibertyAsheville • State of America

- infinity games ∞ infinity solutions ∞ audio/Mac specialist

•••

Begin forwarded message:

From: Brian Umbarger

Date: August 6, 2009 11:25:58 AM EDT

Subject: Fwd: Cash for Hummers

Kind of ironic isn't it?

Funny also that my old 1998 honda accord w/205,000 miles on it doesn't qualify. It's too efficient.

So, in theory, my taxes could (and likely are) going to someone who is turning in their big SUV for another big SUV. Lovely!

Begin forwarded message:

Date: August 6, 2009 9:55:08 AM EDT

Subject: Cash for Hummers

Source: John Stossel's Take

President Obama touted his "Cash for Clunkers" program as a boon to the environment that will "help lessen our dangerous dependence on foreign oil, while reducing greenhouse gas emissions and improving the quality of the air we breathe."

To most people, that might mean the program would encourage the sales of new, high-mileage cars. But lest we forget, this is a government program. And that means loopholes. Patricia Murphyreports that Hummers -- along with other brutes like the Chevy Silverado and Ford Explorer -- are considered "fuel efficient" enough to qualify for the program.

The guidelines in the House-passed bill state that large SUVs and trucks, typically considered gas guzzlers in everyday conversation, qualify for the $3,500 credit, and in some cases the $4,500 credit, depending on the trade-ins that come through the door for them. New Category 2 trucks -- like the Hummer H-3, Ford Explorer, Chevy Silverado, and Toyota Tundra -- qualify if they get at least 15 MPG combined, and get at least one mile per gallon more than the car or truck being traded in.

So next time you see a Hummer on the road, give its driver a wave. He's helping to "lessen our dangerous dependence on foreign oil, while reducing greenhouse gas emissions and improving the quality of the air we breathe."

Read more…

∞∞∞

tyranny deception

i'm a Christian and i recognize that IF the Federal government ever used public money to build church buildings and/or purchase Bibles, they were breaking the law, which is against the tenants of Christianity.

of course, mainstream Christianity largely misinterprets the clear message of Christ, which was that He did not come to destroy God's laws (matt 5:17-20).

what kind of "church" did they build? which denomination? why should an American citizen who has dispensed with observing pagan "holidays" like Sunday, Christmas, Easter, & Halloween, pay for such a "church"?

oh, you don't agree with my faith? then i rest my case in that it is inherently wrong for the STATE to meddle in the matters of CHURCH. this includes marriage and any other church matter.

putting "separation of Church & State" semantics aside, the controversy is really pretty simple: religion is personal and individual, and of NO business of the STATE.

this fact is one of the fundamental reasons why the Theo-Cons & Neo-Cons (generally fascists) are as dangerous to liberty as are the Neo-Liberals (generally socialists).

however, the Neo-Amerikan masses are continually bombarded by the left-right dichotomy deception through the controlled media, and remain largely deceived over the real enemy of liberty, which is TYRANNY.

noteworthy truth: freedom fosters liberty; control fosters tyranny.

this truth is exemplified within "both" sides of the largely and worldly accepted political spectrum and deception of "conservative" vs. "liberal". the track records speak for themselves, and history continues to repeat itself time and time again.

i personally believe that the real battle between liberty and tyranny is spiritual. as i said, i am a Christian, so i personally view the above liberty-tyranny relationship as parallel to: Christ brings liberty; satan brings control.

therefore from my perspective, tyranny knows no political boundaries as it easily infiltrates each and every political activism group and party, turning mere mortals who have common libertarian values/philosophies against one another.

i have personally observed this as being evidenced within various church denominations, ministries, and organizations, as well as secular political groups such as the Libertarian Party, the Ron Paul Revolution, and now i am an outside witness to this occurring in the Republican Party.

perhaps people largely make the tragic mistake in misunderstanding the fact that NO manmade political organization or church denomination corners the market on TRUTH -- none can, for it is impossible for any human or group of humans to do so, even though many continue to attempt such folly in both the secular and religious arenas.

will the human race learn this? or are we all doomed to continue perpetuating the deception which is either being advanced by global elite powers in control of the nations and world banks OR from a spiritual arena?

i honestly do not know at this point. what i do know is that i am impassioned to continue learning more about the principles of liberty in both the secular and spiritual realms. i advise and encourage everyone to do likewise.

in liberty,

8-)

bernard baruch carman

- seeker of truth / seeder of truth • SeedsOfTruth.org • ∞Liberty

- BornToWin.net • FellowshipOfTheWord.org

- We The People • Oath Keepers • LibertyAsheville • State of America

- infinity games ∞ infinity solutions ∞ audio/Mac specialist

•••

in response to:

http://theblogprof.blogspot.com/2009/08/detroit-democrats-campaigning-in-one.html

Tuesday, August 4, 2009

Detroit Democrats Campaigning In The One Place They Say Republicans Can't - Church

The separation of church and state principle is one held in high esteem by all Democrats as a foundational principle, even thou it is not explicitly or implicitly in the U.S. Constitution. In fact, one only need look at the actions of the founding fathers - those that wrote the document that liberals have been twisting ever since. For instance, the U.S. Capitol building was specifically designed to hold church services on Sundays and was used for that very purpose into the 20th century. Even Thomas Jefferson, whom secular progressives love to take out of context, approved wholeheartedly of this use. Back in those days, federal money was used specifically to print Bibles as well, and the federal government promoted Christianity. They didn't "establish" it, they just promoted it. After all, the pilgrims sailed here for that reason, no? It's worthy to note also that Thomas Jefferson himself made federal money available for the building of churches and the printing of Bibles. Actions speak louder than words. Thus, schoolchildren do not learn of such history in indoctrination centers these days.

Today, Democrats love to paint Republicans as the white, Christian party:

So Democrats are for the so-called separation of church and state, except when they're not. As a matter of fact, they have a favorite place to campaign. From The Detroit News: Detroit candidates head to church in search of votes.

Candidates for offices such as mayor and City Council made the final push today, mining votes at churches and other events to try and galvanize a weary electorate to participate in Tuesday's election, which is expected to attract low turnout.

Mayor Dave Bing was the big name among several candidates who attended the Greater Grace Temple mega church on the city's northwest side. Bing said he wasn't there to "talk about politics" and asked for prayer to help him make the right decisions to help save the city.

Other candidates such as City Clerk Janice Winfrey made the service, as well as several contenders running for city council, including Saunteel Jenkins, Charles Pugh and Raphael B. Johnson, who were introduced by Greater Grace Bishop Charles H. Ellis.

Pugh, the former news broadcaster who has been leading all council candidates in one recent election poll, received the warmest applause at Greater Grace when he was introduced.

Pugh said that despite scandal and the federal corruption probe at City Hall, the election features "a good crop of competent young, sharp people who are ready to lead."

Of course they're not there to politic. That's why the news article is in the paper. Because it's no big deal. Ironically, these are Democrats - a party that supports murder of the unborn, discrimination by race, gender, sexual orientation, etc., promotion of the homosexual agenda, all Biblical abominations - going into a church to seek votes. I really do not want to know the kind of people that attend Greater Grace Temple. Do they have Rev. Wright guest speak there?

###

Firearms Refresher Course

1. An armed man is a citizen. An unarmed man is a subject.

2. A gun in the hand is better than a cop on the phone.

3. Colt: The original point and click interface.

4. Gun control is not about guns; it's about control.

5. If guns are outlawed, can we use swords and IEDs? (IED = Improvised Explosive Device)

6. If guns cause crime, then pencils cause misspelled words.

7. Free men do not ask permission to bear arms.

8. If you don't know your rights, you don't have any.

9. Those who trade liberty for security have neither.

10. The United States Constitution (c) 1791. All Rights Reserved.

11. What part of 'shall not be infringed' do you NOT understand?

12. The Second Amendment is in place in case the politicians ignore the others.

13. 64,999,987 firearms owners killed no one yesterday.

14.. Guns have only two enemies; rust and politicians.

15. Know guns, know peace, know safety. No guns, no peace, no safety.

16.. You don't shoot to kill; you shoot to stay alive.

17. 911: Government sponsored Dial-a-Prayer.

18. Assault is a behavior, not a device.

19. Criminals love gun control; it makes their jobs safer

20. If guns cause crime, then matches cause arson.

21. Only a government that is afraid of its citizens tries to control them.

22. You have only the rights you are willing to fight for.

23. Enforce the gun control laws we ALREADY have; don't make more.

24. When you remove the people's right to bear arms, you create slaves.

25. The American Revolution would never have happened with gun control.

friendly additions:

26. The Second Amendment isn't about the right to hunt; it is about the right to defend ourselves against a tyrannical government.

If you feel so moved, share this refresher with friends & family, be they freemen or bondmen.

Noteworthy quotes of LIBERTY to remember:

"And what country can preserve its liberties if its rulers are not warned from time to time that this people preserve the spirit of resistance? Let them take arms! The tree of liberty must be refreshed from time to time with the blood of patriots and tyrants." -- Thomas Jefferson

"When the people fear their government, there is tyranny; when the government fears the people, there is liberty." -- Thomas Jefferson

"Those who would give up essential Liberty, to purchase a little temporary safety, deserve neither Liberty nor safety." -- Benjamin Franklin (1706-1790), 1755

"If men, through fear, fraud, or mistake, should in terms renounce or give up any natural right, the eternal law of reason and the grand end of society would absolutely vacate such renunciation. The right to freedom being a gift of God, it is not in the power of man to alienate this gift and voluntarily become a slave." -- Samuel Adams

"To suppose arms in the hands of citizens, to be used at individual discretion, except in private self-defense, or by partial orders of towns, countries or districts of a state, is to demolish every constitution, and lay the laws prostrate, so that liberty can be enjoyed by no man; it is a dissolution of the government. The fundamental law of the militia is, that it be created, directed and commanded by the laws, and ever for the support of the laws." -- John Adams, A Defence of the Constitutions of the United States 475 (1787-1788)

"False is the idea of utility that sacrifices a thousand real advantages for one imaginary or trifling inconvenience; that would take fire from men because it burns, and water because one may drown in it; that has no remedy for evils except destruction. The laws that forbid the carrying of arms are laws of such a nature. They disarm only those who are neither inclined nor determined to commit crimes.

Can it be supposed that those who have the courage to violate the most sacred laws of humanity, the most important of the code, will respect the less important and arbitrary ones, which can be violated with ease and impunity, and which, if strictly obeyed, would put an end to personal liberty... and subject innocent persons to all the vexations that the guilty alone ought to suffer?

Such laws make things worse for the assaulted and better for the assailants; they serve rather to encourage than to prevent homicides, for an unarmed man may be attacked with greater confidence than an armed man. They ought to be designated as laws not preventive but fearful of crimes, produced by the tumultuous impression of a few isolated facts, and not by thoughtful consideration of the inconveniences and advantages of a universal decree."

-- Cesare Beccaria, Dei delitti e delle pene, [On Crimes and Punishments] ch.38 (1764) Translation is as quoted by Thomas Jefferson in his _Commonplace Book_, 314 (G. Chinard ed. 1926), which was "the source book and repertory of Jefferson's ideas on government." Id. at 4.

Noteworthy quotes of TYRANNY to remember:

"This year will go down in history. For the first time a civilized nation has full gun registration! Our streets will be safer, our police more efficient, and the world will follow our lead into the future." - Adolf Hitler (1935)

"Our task of creating a socialist America can only succeed when those who would resist us have been totally disarmed." - Sara Brady, Chairman, Handgun Control (to Sen. Howard Metzanbaum, The National Educator, Jan 1994, Page 3)

"Gun registration is not enough… Waiting periods are only a step. Registration is only a step. The prohibition of firearms is the goal." - Attorney-General Janet Reno (December 10th, 1993 [AP])

∞ ∞ ∞